Team Profile · built on top of the Individual profile
See the whole team in one picture
The personal profile understands the individual. The team module brings the profiles together into one analysis — so you see the team's strengths, gaps, spread and risks where they arise: between people.
The personal profile is the foundation. The team module is the layer on top.
Teamet samlet · drivkraftkompas
From individual to whole
What you can't see in a single profile
Individual profiles tell you who people are. The team module tells you what happens when they work together — and where the team is strong, uniform or vulnerable.
Spread and breadth
Does the team cluster around the same preferences, or do you cover a broad range? Uniformity gives direction — but also shared blind spots.
Gaps and coverage
Which roles are covered by someone — and which by no one? Role coverage shows the team's real gaps, not just its strengths.
Dynamics and risk
Conflict style, stress risk and motivation across the team — so you can lead proactively instead of putting out fires.
Where does the individual complement — and where do they diverge?
The team's combined drivers on the left. Select a member, and their compass is laid over the team's outline on the right. At a glance you see who pulls the team somewhere new.
Decision: Do you need someone who lifts a driver the team is thin on?
Drivkraftkompas — team mod medlem
Stiplet kontur = teamet · fyld = medlemmet
Teamet samlet
Medlem A
Medlem A ligger højere end teamet på Mestringen og Indsigten, men lavere på Resultatet og Indflydelsen.
How unified — or spread out — is the team?
Each dot is one member placed across the four domains. The line is the team's average. With more profiles you clearly see whether people cluster or complement each other.
Decision: Should the next hire resemble the team — or close a gap?
Domænespredning
Prik = ét medlem · linjen = holdets gennemsnit
Which roles do you have — and which are you missing?
Each role is shown with the members who have it among their strongest. Roles no one covers are the team's gaps — in black and white.
Decision: Is there a critical role no one on the team naturally takes?
Teamets rolledækning
Grøn = nogen har rollen · grå = udækket
How does the team handle disagreement?
Each member is placed by how much they weigh goals versus relationships. A broad conflict profile can be a strength, but also a source of misunderstandings if no one knows the pattern.
Decision: Does the team know how each of them reacts when things get heated?
Konfliktstil
Vandret: relation · lodret: mål
How vulnerable is the team under pressure?
The team's distribution across risk levels, average resilience and the stress archetypes that recur — an early warning, not a diagnosis.
Decision: Who needs relief before the pressure hits?
Stressrisiko
Risikoniveau · resiliens · arketyper
Gns. resiliens
36,6/100
Dominerende
Eftergivende
Everything in the module
Nine layers in one combined analysis
The five above are the ones people remember. Here's the full picture you get access to.
Drive compass
The team's drivers — and where the individual diverges.
Domain spread
The four domains: unified or spread out.
Role coverage
Covered roles — and the team's gaps.
Conflict style
How the team handles disagreement.
Stress risk
Risk level, resilience and archetypes
Team strengths
All 34 strengths — team versus individual member.
Personality type
Four axes — does the team share a preference?
Psychological domains
Big Five with the team's score range.
Motivation
Autonomy, competence, belonging — intrinsic vs. extrinsic.